top of page

CUVEX VS. TRADITIONAL HARDWARE WALLETS

Comparing self-custody solutions solely by brand or popularity is insufficient.

The real difference between Cuvex and most traditional hardware wallets lies not in cryptographic algorithms, but in architecture, threat modeling, and metadata management.

This page provides an honest, technical comparison to support informed decision-making.

TWO DISTINCT APPROACHES

“Wallet + Suite” Approach (Traditional Model)

Represented by most mainstream solutions:

  • Custody device

  • Desktop or mobile application

  • First-party or third-party backend infrastructure

  • Automatic balance synchronization

This model prioritizes convenience and user experience.

Cuvex Approach: Sovereign Signing

  • Personal HSM

  • Watch-only architecture

  • PSBT as the core interface

  • Conscious, fully offline signing

  • Elimination of backend dependencies

The goal is not to simplify custody, but to remove structural dependencies

TECHNICAL COMPARISON

Comparativa_english.jpg

COMPARISON BY USER PROFILES

Convenience-Oriented User

  • Seeks multi-chain support

  • Prioritizes user experience (UX)

  • Accepts reliance on third parties

Recommended model: Traditional hardware wallet.

Sovereignty- and Privacy-Oriented User

  • Prioritizes isolation

  • Avoids data correlation

  • Uses self-hosted nodes or sovereign tooling

Recommended model: Cuvex.

WHY PRIVACY IS THE DECISIVE FACTOR

In most recent incidents:

  • Private keys were not compromised

  • Users were profiled

The correlation of balances, addresses, and activity is the dominant risk vector.

Cuvex eliminates this vector by design.

CUVEX DOES NOT TRY TO BE

For an honest comparison, it is important to be explicit:

  • Cuvex is not a multichain suite

  • Cuvex does not manage DeFi workflows

  • Cuvex does not prioritize UX over security

These choices are intentional and aligned with its threat model.

RELATIONSHIP WITH THE REST OF THE SYSTEM

This comparison can only be properly understood in conjunction with:

CONCLUSION

There is no one size fits all solution.

The right question is not “which hardware wallet is better,” but rather:

Which architecture aligns with my threat model?

Cuvex is designed for those who choose sovereignty, isolation,

and privacy over convenience.

LEARN MORE ABOUT

Cuvex Threat Model

UNDERSTANDING

Privacy by design

LEARN MORE ABOUT

Cuvex Architecture

bottom of page